For an undistorted view of Newton's Second Law

Camila Maria Sitko

Resumo


Context: In general, teachers and students have distorted views about the functioning of a scientific work. This research uses the episode of the historical construction of the Second Law of Movement and seven distorted views on the subject. Objectives: This work aims to exemplify the distorted views students can construct about scientific endeavour if a didactic approach that does not consider the history and philosophy of science is used. Design: Seven distorted views regarding scientific work are explained and, subsequently, exemplified from the episode in question, showing how this history is seen, in general, in textbooks, and by most teachers. Environment and participants: This is a theoretical analysis, not including participants. The materials used were primary and secondary bibliographic sources. Data collection and analysis: Seven distorted views on science, from the episode of the historical construction of the Second Law of Movement, were collected, and a historical-philosophical reflection was carried out on them. Results: Following the presentation of the views and examples, criticism and allusion to how this episode should be treated are offered. Conclusions: Throughout the text, as well as in its final considerations, relevant aspects to be worked on in the classroom are discussed, for a critical view of the construction of scientific knowledge.

Palavras-chave


Newton's Second Law; Second Law of Movement; History and Philosophy of Science; Newton; Leonhard Euler

Texto completo:

PDF (English) PDF


DOI: https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.5316

Apontamentos

  • Não há apontamentos.


Direitos autorais 2020 Camila Maria Sitko

Licença Creative Commons
Esta obra está licenciada sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.

ANÚNCIOS

Informamos que, a partir de outubro de 2024, a revista Acta Scientia volta a aceitar submissões de artigos para publicação.

Mais, informamos que sites fraudulentos, https://periodicos-ulbrabr.org e https://periodicos-ulbrabra.org, estiveram se passando pela Acta Scientiae, utilizando nosso nome e identidade visual e até solicitado taxas de APC, que nós não cobramos. Aconselhamos cautela para evitar serem enganados por sites semelhantes.

Conceito A2 na Capes(2021)

Índice h5 do Google Scholar: 13
Índice mediana h5 do Google Scholar:24

eISSN: 2178-7727

Indexações:

A Acta Scientiae é indexada em:
Scopus logoScopusLatindex logoLatindexedubaseEdubase (SBU/UNICAMP)
Sumarios.org logoSumarios.orgGoogle Scholar logoGoogle ScholarPortal Livre (CNEM) logoPortal LivRe (CNEM)
Journals for Free logoJournals for FreeREDIB logoREDIBGaloá DOIGaloá DOI

Creative Commons License
Todos os trabalhos publicados aqui estão sob uma licença Creative Commons - Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.